Informing & Monitoring
» Capitol Updates
» Leg. Watch
» Press Releases
» Leg Vote Record
» CA Cost Index
» Features
» Audio & Reports
» Job Data
» Calendar
» Coalitions
» Fed Update 
» Policy Objectives
» Policy Principles


Membership
»Invest in CMTA
»About Us
»Yellow Pages
»Questions?

Conferences
 Oct. 21 California's Regulatory Landscape -- GETTING IT RIGHT

Directories


»CMTA Staff
»Send us e-mail
»Directions to CMTA
»Rent Conference Room



Services & Discounts
  »Group WC Program
  »Discount Programs
  »ETP


Grassroots Activism
Sign up to receive action alerts

Already registered?






Calendar

»Full listing

Committee meetings:
 Sept. 9
Energy

 Sept. 9
Corporate Counsel

 Sept. 16
Government Relations

 Sept. 16
Tax

 Sept. 17
Labor Employment

 Sept. 22
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

 Sept. 23
Energy

 Sept. 23
Environmental quality

 Oct. 7
Energy

 Oct. 13
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

 Oct. 14
Corporate Counsel

 Oct. 15
Labor Employment

 Oct. 21
Environmental quality
California's Regulatory Landscape -- GETTING IT RIGHT

 Oct. 21
Tax

 Oct. 22
Board of Directors

 Oct. 27
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

 Oct. 28
Environmental quality

 Nov. 4
Energy


Contact us at members@cmta.net
 
Employer Grassroots
Get action alerts
and send targeted e-mails to legislators
Already registered?
    

Employee Grassroots
Encourage your employees to register to vote

CMTA legislative database

SB 122
Unfair Competition Law

Latest CMTA position: OPPOSE
Expands abusive and frivolous lawsuits


LegInfo: Bill text

Location: Assembly Floor

Authorizes a party to request court review and approval of a settlement or compromise of an unfair competition action brought or proposed to be brought by a private party on behalf of the general public. Requires that the plaintiff in those actions serve a specified notice on each defendant in the action and submit a copy of the complaint to the State Bar of California (not the AG). Does not reform the state's Unfair Competition Law as companies will continue to be sued even when no individual is involved or harmed. There would be no finality to these cases. This bill is double-joined to AB 95.




CMTA staff information
CMTA legislative aide: Loretta Macktal
  
Headlines
» Prop. 64 Backers Fight for Attention -  Nov. 1
An all-star list of businesses has poured more than $15 million into a campaign to pass Proposition ...  Marc Lifsher in the L.A. Times7723

» Voters can make state competitive – or not -  Oct. 27
Once a year, Forbes magazine publishes its list of the best places for business in America. This ...   Editorial in the San Diego U-T7675

» The Chronicle Recommends Yes on 64 -  Oct. 26
California's 70-year-old Unfair Competition Law has produced myriad examples of how the legal ...   Editorial in the San Francisco Chron.7649

VOTE HISTORY
 June 4
Senate Floor

Aanestad NO
Ashburn NO
Cedillo YES
Denham NO
Ducheny YES
Florez YES
Hollingsworth NO
Romero YES
Torlakson YES

 June 4
Assembly Floor

Benoit NO
Calderon Abstained
Cogdill NO
Cox NO
Dutton NO
Hancock YES
Harman NO
Kehoe YES
Leno YES
Liu NO
Lowenthal YES
Maldonado NO
Oropeza YES
Pavley YES
Ridley-Thomas YES
Simitian YES
Wolk YES
Wyland NO
Yee YES