Informing & Monitoring
» Capitol Updates
» Leg. Watch
» Press Releases
» Leg Vote Record
» CA Cost Index
» Features
» Audio & Reports
» Job Data
» Calendar
» Coalitions
» Fed Update 
» Policy Objectives
» Policy Principles


Membership
»Invest in CMTA
»About Us
»Yellow Pages
»Questions?

Conferences
 Oct. 21 California's Regulatory Landscape -- GETTING IT RIGHT

Directories


»CMTA Staff
»Send us e-mail
»Directions to CMTA
»Rent Conference Room



Services & Discounts
  »Group WC Program
  »Discount Programs
  »ETP


Grassroots Activism
Sign up to receive action alerts

Already registered?






Calendar

»Full listing

Committee meetings:
 Aug. 5
Energy

 Aug. 12
Corporate Counsel

 Aug. 18
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

 Aug. 19
Government Relations

 Aug. 19
Tax

 Aug. 26
Energy

 Aug. 26
Environmental quality

 Sept. 9
Energy

 Sept. 9
Corporate Counsel

 Sept. 15
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

 Sept. 16
Government Relations

 Sept. 16
Tax

 Sept. 17
Labor Employment

 Sept. 23
Energy

 Sept. 23
Environmental quality


Contact us at members@cmta.net
 

Renewable power mandate's best-case scenario: 7% rate increase

Posted by Gino DiCaro, Vice President, Communications on Sept. 8, 2009

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger could get a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) bill on his desk after the state's legislative session ends this week.  SB 14 by Sen. Joe Simitian would deny California utilities access to the most cost-effective energy and, according to the Public Utilities Commission, raise the state's industrial electricity costs at least 7 percent.  The Energy Information Administration states that existing rates are already 45 percent more expensive than the nation and 80 percent higher than the western region.

California industry can barely compete with its neighboring states and energy costs play a major role in that imbalance.  The AB 32 greenhouse gas law that passed in 2006 already allows the California Air Resources Board to implement RPS in a cost-effective manner.   Gov. Schwarzenegger should veto this bill because it will impose huge new costs and threaten high wage manufacturing jobs in California.

Read Letter to Gov. Schwarzenegger


0 comments | Post your comment

Comments: 0


Post a comment:

E-mail address: required, but will be kept private


Name or nickname: will display on page


Post your comment here:


Verification: To help prevent abuse, please enter the word shown above.




Copyright © 2010, California Manufacturers & Technology Association. All rights reserved.