![]() Informing & Monitoring » Capitol Updates » Leg. Watch » Press Releases » Leg Vote Record » CA Cost Index » Features » Audio & Reports » Job Data » Calendar » Coalitions » Fed Update ![]() » Policy Objectives » Policy Principles Membership »Invest in CMTA »About Us »Yellow Pages »Questions? Conferences Oct. 21 California's Regulatory Landscape -- GETTING IT RIGHT Directories »CMTA Staff »Send us e-mail »Directions to CMTA »Rent Conference Room Services & Discounts »Group WC Program »Discount Programs »ETP Grassroots Activism Sign up to receive action alerts |
![]() Renewable power mandate's best-case scenario: 7% rate increasePosted by Gino DiCaro, Vice President, Communications on Sept. 8, 2009California industry can barely compete with its neighboring states and energy costs play a major role in that imbalance. The AB 32 greenhouse gas law that passed in 2006 already allows the California Air Resources Board to implement RPS in a cost-effective manner. Gov. Schwarzenegger should veto this bill because it will impose huge new costs and threaten high wage manufacturing jobs in California. Read Letter to Gov. Schwarzenegger 0 comments | Post your comment Comments: 0 |