Informing & Monitoring
» Capitol Updates
» Leg. Watch
» Press Releases
» Leg Vote Record
» CA Cost Index
» Features
» Audio & Reports
» Job Data
» Calendar
» Coalitions
» Fed Update 
» Policy Objectives
» Policy Principles


Membership
»Invest in CMTA
»About Us
»Yellow Pages
»Questions?

Conferences
July 29 "Energy 2020"

Directories


»CMTA Board
»CMTA Membership
»CMTA Staff
»Send us e-mail
»Directions to CMTA
»Rent Conference Room



Services & Discounts
  »Group WC Program
  »Discounts
  »ETP


Grassroots Activism
Sign up to receive action alerts

Already registered?






Calendar

»Full listing

Committee meetings:
Jan. 9
Workers' compensation

Jan. 9
Human Resources

Jan. 15
Tax

Jan. 15
Government Relations

Jan. 22
Energy

Jan. 22
Environmental quality

Jan. 28
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

Feb. 12
Energy

Feb. 13
Workers' compensation

Feb. 13
Human Resources

Feb. 18
CMTA Climate Change Advisory Committee

Feb. 19
Tax

Feb. 19
Government Relations

Feb. 23
Corporate Counsel

Feb. 26
Energy

Feb. 26
Environmental quality


Contact us at members@cmta.net
 

Recommendation for Moratorium on New and Increased Business Fees


Summary: During times of budgetary pressure, government may attempt to shift costs to business. In order to protect the economy, and ensure the effectiveness of economic stimulus measures, CMTA recommends that a two-year moratorium on new business fees and taxes be instituted.

State agencies are being asked to submit plans to the administration for 15% cuts in general fund revenues. To offset this loss, agencies may attempt to impose new fees or taxes on the regulated community. Such cost shifting undermines the ability of business to weather difficult economic times and leads to further erosion of the state’s economy.

One CMTA member was concerned that an annual $2,000 Department of Conservation fee for mining facilities would be simply increased to make up for revenue losses and eliminate any need for department expense cuts.

Another example is the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and its steady drop in fee revenue. Rather than scale back program activities or staff, it is likely that DTSC will offset this with new or increased fees on the shrinking number of businesses it regulates.

In lean times these are the policies that are so often made when there isn’t enough money to go around.

Proposals:

  • Impose a two-year moratorium on new fees and taxes. During this period, any new costs associated with legislative mandates should be absorbed in existing revenues. This approach is consistent with many of the Governor’s actions on 2001 legislation.
  • Track administrative penalty activity. Agencies can also use administrative penalty authority to backfill other revenue losses. Typically, administrative penalty assessments are not subject to judicial challenge. Notify agencies that evidence of disproportionate fines suggesting abuse of this authority will result in a full audit of administrative penalty programs and related activities invoking this authority.
Benefits: Fee-based cost shifting to businesses to offset revenue losses will lead to further economic dislocation in the short term and will slow economic recovery. In addition, the opportunity to achieve real savings and efficiencies in government programs will be lost. The economic stimulus measures adopted by the state will more likely succeed if other costs of doing business stay the same or decline.

###